| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism
Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism are two distinct strains of libertarianism.〔http://www.willwilkinson.net/political%20philosophy/filthy%20non-theoretical%20politics/2014/01/20/liberalism-libertarianism-and-the-illiberal-security-state/〕 Although anarcho-capitalists and minarchists agree on most political issues, they are sometimes hostile towards each other, particularly because most adherents of both philosophies support the non-aggression principle and see the opposing philosophy as misrepresenting its political implications. Minarchists believe that it is the responsibility of the state to enforce NAP, while anarcho-capitalists see the state as a violation of NAP, and believe that all valuable services - including law and defense - are best provided in the marketplace.
== Philosophical disagreements ==
Anarcho-capitalism advocates abolishing the state. Minarchism has been variously defined by sources. In the strictest sense, it is the political philosophy which maintains that the state is necessary and that its only legitimate function is the protection of individuals from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud, and the only legitimate governmental institutions are the military, police, and courts. In the broadest sense, it also includes fire departments, prisons, the executive, and legislatures as legitimate government functions.〔Gregory, Anthory.(The Minarchist's Dilemma ). ''Strike The Root''. 10 May 2004.〕〔http://www.peikoff.com/2011/03/07/what-role-should-certain-specific-governments-play-in-objectivist-government/〕〔http://www.peikoff.com/2011/10/03/interview-with-yaron-brook-on-economic-issues-in-todays-world-part-1/〕 Minarchist states are called night-watchman states.
Minarchists generally justify the state on the grounds that it is the logical consequence of adhering to the non-aggression principle. Some minarchists argue that anarchism is immoral because it implies that the non-aggression principle is optional. They argue that this is because the creation and enforcement of laws under anarchism is open to competition. Others argue that competing defense or dispute resolution organizations lack a "court of final appeals" or "single arbitration network." Another common justification is that private defense and court firms would tend to represent the interests of those who pay them enough. Anarcho-capitalists generally argue that the state violates the non-aggression principle by its nature because governments use force against those who have not stolen private property, vandalized private property, assaulted anyone, or committed fraud.〔Long, Roderick, (Market Anarchism as Constitutionalism ), ''(Molinari Institute )''.〕〔Plauché, Geoffrey Allan (2006). (On the Social Contract and the Persistence of Anarchy ), ''American Political Science Association'', (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University).〕 Many also argue that monopolies tend to be corrupt and inefficient.
Anarcho-capitalists generally argue that private defense and court agencies would have to have a good reputation in order to stay in business. Furthermore, Linda & Morris Tannehill argue that no coercive monopoly of force can arise on a truly free market and that a government's citizenry can’t desert them in favor of a competent protection and defense agency.〔Linda & Morris Tannehill. ''(The Market for Liberty )'', p. 81.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|